<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Safeguard Screening &#187; e-verify</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.safeguardscreening.com/category/e-verify/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.safeguardscreening.com</link>
	<description>Your source for Employment Screening Background Checks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 19:08:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New DOT Drug test regimen goes into effect</title>
		<link>http://www.safeguardscreening.com/2010/new-dot-drug-test-regimen-goes-into-effect/</link>
		<comments>http://www.safeguardscreening.com/2010/new-dot-drug-test-regimen-goes-into-effect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 13:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Safeguard Screening</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DOT Drug Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-verify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare background checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MVRS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safeguardscreening.com/?p=161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department of Transportation has enacted changes to the DOT compliance drug test regimen effective October 1st, 2010.  While the drug test is still a 5 panel regimen, it will include new testing for HDMA (Esctasy) and lower cut off levels for amphetamines and cocaine.    The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services estimates that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.safeguardscreening.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/commercial-truck-front-right-anglejpg.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-162" title="commercial-truck-front-right-anglejpg" src="http://www.safeguardscreening.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/commercial-truck-front-right-anglejpg-300x224.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="224" /></a>The Department of Transportation has enacted changes to the DOT compliance drug test regimen effective October 1st, 2010.  While the drug test is still a 5 panel regimen, it will include new testing for HDMA (Esctasy) and lower cut off levels for amphetamines and cocaine.    The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services estimates that as much as 10 percent additional users of cocaine and amphetamines will be identified with the lower testing amounts.</p>
<p><a title="DOT drug testing" href="http://www.corragroup.com/DOT-drug-screening.html">The DOT drug test will continue to test for following 5-panels </a>Marijuana (THC), Cocaine, Amphetamines, Opiates, and Phencyclidine (PCP).   To the amphetamines group, the DOT is adding initial testing for MDMA (Ecstasy) and confirmatory testing for MDMA, MDA, &amp; MDEA.</p>
<p>It should be interesting to see what happens across the transportation industry due to the lower result levels for amphetamines.  While the new drug Ecstasy might not be a drug of choice among drivers, the allure of using amphetamines to help keep going on a long haul is much more industry relevant.</p>
<p>Need to establish a DOT-drug testing program?  Contact Corra Group, a <a title="DOT Drug Testing" href="http://www.corragroup.com/DOT-physical-exams.html">nationwide provider of DOT drug testing compliance programs</a>, including DOT employment verifications, DOT Physical exams, and random drug testing management.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.safeguardscreening.com%2F2010%2Fnew-dot-drug-test-regimen-goes-into-effect%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'New+DOT+Drug+test+regimen+goes+into+effect';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.safeguardscreening.com/2010/new-dot-drug-test-regimen-goes-into-effect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opposition to E-Verify mounts in face of raids</title>
		<link>http://www.safeguardscreening.com/2008/opposition-to-e-verify-mounts-in-face-of-raids/</link>
		<comments>http://www.safeguardscreening.com/2008/opposition-to-e-verify-mounts-in-face-of-raids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Safeguard Screening</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-verify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-9 Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Industries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SHRM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safeguardscreening.com/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An interesting detail about the high profile raid of Howard Industries, in which 595 suspected illegal workers were arrested, is Howard claims they were using the E-Verify electronic I-9 compliance system established by the federal government to help employers remain in compliance with federal labor laws.  In addition, Swift Co, which was raided in December 2006, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting detail about the high profile raid of Howard Industries, in which 595 suspected illegal workers were arrested, is Howard claims they were using the <strong>E-Verify electronic I-9 compliance system </strong>established by the federal government to help employers remain in compliance with federal labor laws.  In addition, Swift Co, which was raided in December 2006, also claims they were using E-Verify before they were raided.</p>
<p>Apparently <a href="http://www.shrm.org">SHRM</a> has established a organization called <strong>HR Initiative for a Legal Workforce </strong>which has criticized the effectiveness of E-Verify.</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.workforce.com/section/00/article/25/74/72.php">E-Verify</a>, which checks information from I-9 forms against Department of Homeland Security and Social Security Administration databases, cannot tell if a worker is submitting a stolen Social Security number.</p></blockquote>
<p>Based on the article in <strong>Workforce Management</strong>, the proof that Howard Industries was using E-Verify is a statement from the company &#8220;Howard Industries runs every check allowed to ascertain the immigration status of all applicants for jobs&#8221;  There was no indication that an independant investigation of Howard Industries was conducted to determine if they were using E-Verify correctly, or screening every employee.  Perhaps they weren&#8217;t.  Perhaps by using E-Verify, Howard Industries opened themselves up to an easier investigation of its practices by the Feds.  I suppose it would be a simple arithmetic problem; how many employees it files on payroll, and how many submitted on E-Verify.  Even if they match, it seems that the E-verify helps the government locate abused SSNs and duplicate employment records for stolen SSNs.  </p>
<p>It should be interesting to see if the quality of <a title="I-9 Compliance" href="http://www.corragroup.com/ALaCarteProducts.html">E-verify I-9 Compliance </a>pans out, and how the system is adopted in a largely volunteer space.</p>
<p><a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/e-verify">e-verify</a><br />
<a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/i-9%20compliance">i-9 compliance</a><br />
<a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/howard%20industries">howard industries</a><br />
<a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/shrm">SHRM</a></p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.safeguardscreening.com%2F2008%2Fopposition-to-e-verify-mounts-in-face-of-raids%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Opposition+to+E-Verify+mounts+in+face+of+raids';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.safeguardscreening.com/2008/opposition-to-e-verify-mounts-in-face-of-raids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

