<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Safeguard Screening &#187; e-verify</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.safeguardscreening.com/category/e-verify/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.safeguardscreening.com</link>
	<description>Your source for Employment Screening Background Checks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:44:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Opposition to E-Verify mounts in face of raids</title>
		<link>http://www.safeguardscreening.com/2008/opposition-to-e-verify-mounts-in-face-of-raids/</link>
		<comments>http://www.safeguardscreening.com/2008/opposition-to-e-verify-mounts-in-face-of-raids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Safeguard Screening</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-9 Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-verify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Industries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SHRM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safeguardscreening.com/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An interesting detail about the high profile raid of Howard Industries, in which 595 suspected illegal workers were arrested, is Howard claims they were using the E-Verify electronic I-9 compliance system established by the federal government to help employers remain in compliance with federal labor laws.  In addition, Swift Co, which was raided in December 2006, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting detail about the high profile raid of Howard Industries, in which 595 suspected illegal workers were arrested, is Howard claims they were using the <strong>E-Verify electronic I-9 compliance system </strong>established by the federal government to help employers remain in compliance with federal labor laws.  In addition, Swift Co, which was raided in December 2006, also claims they were using E-Verify before they were raided.</p>
<p>Apparently <a href="http://www.shrm.org">SHRM</a> has established a organization called <strong>HR Initiative for a Legal Workforce </strong>which has criticized the effectiveness of E-Verify.</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.workforce.com/section/00/article/25/74/72.php">E-Verify</a>, which checks information from I-9 forms against Department of Homeland Security and Social Security Administration databases, cannot tell if a worker is submitting a stolen Social Security number.</p></blockquote>
<p>Based on the article in <strong>Workforce Management</strong>, the proof that Howard Industries was using E-Verify is a statement from the company &#8220;Howard Industries runs every check allowed to ascertain the immigration status of all applicants for jobs&#8221;  There was no indication that an independant investigation of Howard Industries was conducted to determine if they were using E-Verify correctly, or screening every employee.  Perhaps they weren&#8217;t.  Perhaps by using E-Verify, Howard Industries opened themselves up to an easier investigation of its practices by the Feds.  I suppose it would be a simple arithmetic problem; how many employees it files on payroll, and how many submitted on E-Verify.  Even if they match, it seems that the E-verify helps the government locate abused SSNs and duplicate employment records for stolen SSNs.  </p>
<p>It should be interesting to see if the quality of <a title="I-9 Compliance" href="http://www.corragroup.com/ALaCarteProducts.html">E-verify I-9 Compliance </a>pans out, and how the system is adopted in a largely volunteer space.</p>
<p><a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/e-verify">e-verify</a><br />
<a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/i-9%20compliance">i-9 compliance</a><br />
<a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/howard%20industries">howard industries</a><br />
<a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/shrm">SHRM</a></p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.safeguardscreening.com%2F2008%2Fopposition-to-e-verify-mounts-in-face-of-raids%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Opposition+to+E-Verify+mounts+in+face+of+raids';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.safeguardscreening.com/2008/opposition-to-e-verify-mounts-in-face-of-raids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
